The physical space of the MSK Library is permanently closed to visitors as of Friday, May 17, 2024. Please visit this guide for more information.
A protocol is the foundation of a successful systematic review. Committing to writing one as a team is a best research practice as it defines your research question and the steps of the project for everyone involved.
When completed early in your review process, the protocol:
The PRISMA for Systematic Review Protocols (PRISMA-P) extension lays out everything your team needs to include in a systematic review protocol. Protocol registries follow similar, if not identical, requirements.
If you are working on a scoping review, JBI offers a template for scoping review protocols.
You have several choices as to where to register a review protocol:
It is an option, but not a requirement, to publish your review protocol. Here is a selection of journals that accept them. Note that all of these journals charge article processing fees.
The MSK Library requires that systematic review teams have begun work on a protocol before a librarian will begin work on a search strategy. This includes at minimum a focused research question and inclusion and exclusion criteria.
If you need assistance getting started, we can set up a preliminary meeting with you to:
PRISMA-P protocols:
Your MSK librarian can also work with you to determine the review requirements of your target journal(s), which may impact the plans for your review as reflected in your protocol.
Covidence has an eBook on how to write a protocol for an intervention systematic review: A Practical Guide to Protocol Development for Systematic Reviews. This is free to download, and includes examples for each step of the process.